Understanding the Error
The ObjectDisposedException typically occurs when an attempt is made to use an object that has already been disposed. In the context of ASP.NET Core and Entity Framework, this often involves the DbContext. The error message generally looks like this:
System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
This exception usually arises from incorrect service lifetimes, improper asynchronous programming, or manually disposing of the DbContext.
Common Causes and Solutions
1. Manual Disposal of DbContext
ASP.NET Core’s dependency injection (DI) framework manages the lifecycle of DbContext instances. Manually disposing of a DbContext instance resolved through DI can lead to this error.
Solution: Avoid wrapping DbContext in a using statement or explicitly calling Dispose(). Let the DI container manage the lifecycle of the context.
// Incorrect
using (var context = new ApplicationDbContext()) {
// ...
}
// Correct - Let DI manage the lifecycle
public class MyService {
private readonly ApplicationDbContext _context;
public MyService(ApplicationDbContext context) {
_context = context;
}/
public void DoWork() {
// Use _context here
}
}
2. Incorrect Service Lifetime Configuration
DbContext must be registered with a scoped lifetime, which aligns with the lifecycle of a single web request. Registering it as a singleton or transient can lead to disposed object issues.
- Solution: Ensure proper service registration in
Startup.csorProgram.cs:
services.AddDbContext<ApplicationDbContext>(options =>
options.UseSqlServer(Configuration.GetConnectionString("DefaultConnection")));
3. Asynchronous Programming Pitfalls
- Unawaited Asynchronous Calls: Failing to await asynchronous methods can result in the
DbContextbeing disposed before the operation completes. - Using ****
async void: Avoid usingasync voidas it can lead to unobserved exceptions and premature disposal of theDbContext. - Solution: Properly await all asynchronous calls and ensure methods return a
Task.
// Correct
public async Task ProcessDataAsync() {
await _context.MyEntities.ToListAsync();
}
4. **Background Tasks Accessing **DbContext
Starting new threads or background tasks that try to access a DbContext from the main thread can lead to this error. Each thread or task should manage its own DbContext instance.
- Solution: Use scoped services for background tasks and create new
DbContextinstances where necessary.
Task.Run(async () => {
using (var scope = serviceProvider.CreateScope()) {
var context = scope.ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService<ApplicationDbContext>();
await context.MyEntities.ToListAsync();
}
});
Best Practices
1. Service Registration
Always register DbContext with a scoped lifetime using AddDbContext.
2. Avoid Manual Disposal
Let the DI container handle the lifecycle of DbContext instances.
3. Proper Asynchronous Programming
Always await asynchronous calls and avoid async void methods.
4. Manage Background Tasks Properly
Ensure that background tasks have their own service scopes and DbContext instances.
5. Use Logging to Debug
Enable detailed logging in ASP.NET Core to identify where the DbContext might be disposed prematurely.
services.AddLogging(logging => {
logging.AddConsole();
logging.AddDebug();
});
Conclusion
By understanding the lifecycle of DbContext, avoiding manual disposal, and following best practices, you can prevent the “Cannot access a disposed object” exception in ASP.NET Core applications. Proper service configuration, disciplined asynchronous programming, and careful handling of background tasks are key to ensuring stable and maintainable code.
async void – Thx for hint it saved my day 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
man, you saved my day.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You are my savior
LikeLiked by 1 person
Saved my day !
LikeLiked by 1 person
Perfect! Thanks
LikeLiked by 1 person
async void – thanks!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi, Thanks for the article. I encountered the cannot access dispose exception while I use the Task.run() inside a async method. Actually the Task.run() executes in loop for calling a service method. After the 1st call, am getting the issue, may be due to the dependency injection disposes the client after the 1st call. how to create new instance of my DI object for each service call?
LikeLike
I think you do now await your Run() calls. They are probably still executing when your parent object goes out of scope.
LikeLike
thank you so much, tried to resolve this for half a day. it was a failty async void method in my case
LikeLiked by 1 person
You save my day!!!! async void was my problem
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so much! I would not have figured out my issue (used async Void) without your input.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You should also be aware of “hidden” async void, e.g. if you use ForEach(async () => {}). This will fail but a normal foreach loop with an await on the EF async call will be OK. More on this here https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30260858/c-sharp-async-await-using-linq-foreach
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank u, it was an async void problem.
LikeLike
Thanks a ton! Aync void was the problem. I really find this aync await (thread programming) confusing!!
LikeLike